From Ad IDEM / CMLA
Welcome to the Ad IDEM / Canadian Media Lawyers Association Website
Ad IDEM stands for Advocates In Defence of Expression in Media / Avocats pour la defense de l'expression dans les medias (the capital letters in bold spelling "MEDIA" (from right to left)). We are also known by the acronym CMLA, the Canadian Media Lawyers Association.
Our members are leading media lawyers across Canada. We organize a major annual conference, intervene in important Supreme Court of Canada cases, and promote improved laws and policies for free expression and openness of courts.
AdIDEM/CMLA is dedicated to the protection and enhancement of free expression in Canada and abroad. Our aim is to achieve this objective through:
* public and professional education * advocacy and law reform initiatives * cooperation with related professional organizations
AdIDEM/CMLA members are lawyers representing the media across Canada. Associate Members, who may or may not be lawyers, have had experience in issues involving media law and free expression, and are advocates for free expression as well.[| Read more...]
|July 17, 2015||Kent v Postmedia Network Inc 2015 ABQB 461|
|Paul Godfrey, CEO of the National Post and Gordon Fisher, former publisher of the National Post, are granted summary judgment in dismissing all claims against them in this defamation action brought by Arthur Kent.
|July 15, 2015||Canadian Union of Postal Workers v Quebecor Media Inc 2015 ONSC 4511|
|This judgment sets out what constitutes proper notice and the ability of unions to sue for defamation.
|July 3, 2015||Chandra v CBC 2015 ONSC 3945|
|This interim decision concerns the admissibility into evidence of confidential materials from an unrelated proceeding, obtained by journalists in good faith.
|July 2, 2015||Jane Doe v London Free Press 2015 ONSC 4239|
|A witness in a sexual assault trial sues the London Free Press for breaching a publication ban.
|April 30, 2015||Postmedia Network Inc. v Merrifield 2015 ONSC 2847|
|The media applicants brought an unsuccessful application for a declaration that their rights under s. 2(b) of the Charter had been infringed and to set aside an earlier order which excluded the public from the trial proceedings and sealed all court records relating to the matters being heard.
|April 20, 2015||Michael Elder v Toronto Life Publishing Co. Ltd. 2015 ONSC|
|Michael Elder failed in his motion for an interlocutory injunction to prevent further dissemination of the May issue of Toronto Life magazine, which contained an article about him.
|March 30, 2015||Figueiras v Toronto (Police Services Board) 2015 ONCA 0208|
|In this judgment the Court weighs freedom of expression and other "fundamental" liberties strongly in the balance when denying police at the G20 summit the power to detain, turn back, or search protestors approaching the summit area, as an exercise of common law police powers.
|February 23, 2015||Baglow v Smith 2015 ONSC 1175|
|Fair comment prevails in the battle between the bloggers.
|February 18, 2015||R. v Jha 2015 ONSC 1064|
|A publication ban is varied to prohibit ONLY the publication of names of any surviving children of an accused in this second degree murder trial.
|February 5, 2015||Weaver v Corcoran 2015 BCSC 165|
|The court concludes that as long as defamatory reader comments are removed promptly after being brought to the attention of the host site, there has been no publication, and there is no need to consider the defence of innocent dissemination.