Australian Broadcasting
Corporation v Lenah Game Meats Pty Ltd
November 15, 2001 ([2001] HCA 63)
Lenah Game tried to get an injunction preventing broadcast by ABC
of a film that was made by others with a hidden camera on Lenah's
premises. They claimed that the film was made illegally, was meant
to show them in a bad light, and cause it irreparable harm.
The test for injunctive relief in Australia is the American Cyanamid
test. As to whether there was a serious question to be tried, the
issue was whether the plaintiff had a substantive claim against
the broadcaster, as opposed to the filmmakers. The court found that
Lenah had no legal or substantive right that would justify an injunction
against ABC. As well, the court held that a corporation does not
have a right of privacy.
The decision was not unanimous in its reasoning. Kirby J.'s decision
was based on a constitutional argument to the effect that free discussion
of governmental and political issues of animal welfare in this context
should have led to the exercise of discretion against granting the
interlocutory injunction.
One justice dissented.
See Australian
Broadcasting Corporation v Lenah Game Meats Pty Ltd
|